Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Some thoughts on funding education (or at least saving some money to reduce budget cuts)

Point 1... Recently I worked on a group project analyzing ways in which to "green up" a company. What we found is that almost all of our proposed ideas would actually save the commpany money.

Point 2... I constantly hear professors at the university I attend complain about budget cuts, small budgets for marketing their programs, and many other things.

Point 3... 2 + 2 = 5... They are wasting money in so many areas it is rediculous. To me it is the same as burnig money and then complaining because you lack the funds to feed yourself. What to do??? Rationality says quite burning the money and buy some food. What do we do???  A friend of mine is actually working on this subject and after seeing what we had done on our group project asked me to help her prepare suggestions backed up by numbers and present them with her to the university's VP of finance. I don't know where this all will lead but I will keep you posted.

Thinking about this after running some numbers, I began to see just how much money is wasted. If all universities across the US and for that matter, the world became more efficient we would not only help our environment but we would help our budget problems too!

Keep reading as I will keep you posted in the months to come.....

Greenest companies to work for

Latrely I have been thinking about the importance of finding a company that shares your values. If I truly want to be both happy in life and proud of my work I need to find companies to work for that have some common values. Only then will I be able to thrive at my job.

All info was found in Fortune article on CNN's web site http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0703/gallery.green_giants.fortune/

I did some research and found a list of some green companies. Here is what I found out...

#1
Honda (see a previous blog for info on their hydrogen-powered vehicle!)
Location: Japan
Year founded: 1945
Revenue: $84.2 Billion
Employees: 145,000
The most fuel-efficient auto company in the U.S.

While other automakers gripe, Honda attacks the issues of fuel economy and emissions with relish. Working independently, it is focusing on two alternative fuel technologies, the natural gas powered "Civic GX" and the hydrogen fuel cell "FCX." Honda has also taken a crack at solving a problem other automakers have left to the oil companies: creating an infrastructure for hydrogen. Honda's solution is for individual refueling stations that provide heat and electricity for the home as well as hydrogen for a fuel-cell-powered car. Long term, Honda wants to be the world's cleanest, most efficient manufacturer. It has promised to reduce CO2 emissions from its factories as well as its vehicles by 5 percent between 2005 and 2010 - on top of the 5 percent it achieved between 2000 and 2005. --Alex Taylor III
 
#2
Continental Airlines
Location: Houston
Year founded: 1934
Revenue: $13.1 Billion
Employees: 44,000
Worked with Boeing to engineer more fuel-efficient aircraft.

AMID RISING concern about aviation pollution, British Airways introduced a "CO2 emission calculator" on its website, letting passengers pay to offset the carbon dioxide generated by their flights. Lufthansa recently equipped an Airbus A340 with a 1.5-ton mobile laboratory to track gases and compounds. But it is American airline Continental that's gone furthest to green operations. Besides spending more than $16 billion over the past ten years to replace its fleet with more efficient aircraft, it installed fuel-saving winglets that reduce emissions by up to 5% on most of its Boeing 737s and 757s, and reduced the nitrogen oxide output from ground equipment at its Houston hub by over 75% since 2000. Its 13 full-time staff environmentalists work with engine manufacturers, design green terminals, and track carbon emissions and chemical recycling daily. Even all the trash from company headquarters is later sorted for recyclables. --Barney Gimbel
 
#3
Suncor
Location: Canada
Year founded: 1917
Revenue: $13.6 Billion
Employees: 5,500
Measures the environmental impact of each project.

Finding black gold is a dirty job - particularly when it's buried in tar sands. But Suncor still stands out for how it does the job. Its environmental and social efforts have earned it membership in the Dow Jones sustainability index and the British equivalent, the FTSE4Good. In a survey of 23 global oil companies last year, Jantzi Research, a Canadian consultancy, named Suncor a top performer, noting its environmental and greenhouse-gas management programs. Specifically, it has improved emissions intensity (the amount of oil it extracts per ton of greenhouse gases emitted) 25 percent since 1990. Ditto for energy, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide. Suncor is part of an initiative to develop carbon-capture techniques. And while Suncor hopes to double its production by 2012, its water management is so advanced that it expects to draw no additional water from Alberta's Athabasca River. --Cait Murphy
 
#4
Tesco
Location: Britain
Year founded: 1919
Revenue: $71 Billion
Employees: 380,000
Cut energy use and is trying to get customers to think green.

Wind-powered stores, high-tech recycling, biodiesel delivery trucks - Tesco does all that. Last year the company pledged to cut the average energy use in its British buildings in half by 2010; now it says it will get there two years early. State-of-the-art trains that have lower-than-normal noise and pollution reduce the use of trucks, slashing thousands of tons of carbon dioxide emissions; in a major store initiative, Tesco will estimate the "carbon costs" of each item. To ensure that its leadership walks the talk, Tesco now determines senior-management bonuses partly on meeting energy- and waste-reduction targets. Tesco is also encouraging customers to be greener by awarding points, redeemable for merchandise, to those who bring their own reusable shopping bags. --Matthew Boyle
 
#5
Alcan
Location: Canada
Year founded: 1902
Revenue: $23.6 Billion
Employees: 68,000
Investing in clean, efficient manufacturing

When Alcan took over French rival Pechiney in late 2003, the Montreal-based aluminum maker also landed world-class smelting technology. Because of Pechiney's proprietary methods (and an aggressive push by Alcan to track emissions), the company has been able to reduce its greenhouse-gas output by 25 percent since 1990, while production increased 40 percent. Alcan's latest goal is to install a high-capacity process that increases energy efficiency by as much as 20 percent and lowers emissions. A pilot plant in Quebec is already under construction. "It's inherent to the engineering culture to respond to problems like these," says Alcan's Corey Copeland. "It's what makes engineers tick." --Jia Lynn Yang
 
#6
PG&E
Location: San Francisco
Year founded: 1852
Revenue: $12.5 Billion
Employees: 20,000
Strategic investments in efficiency and renewables.

PG&E Played a big role in getting mandatory controls on greenhouse gases enacted last year in California, and CEO Peter Darbee is now pushing for federal legislation.

The utility generates 56 percent of its retail electricity sales from non-greenhouse-gas-emitting sources, and it aggressively helps customers become more efficient. For instance, it subsidizes homeowners who buy energy-efficient appliances with $75 grants. PG&E is also experimenting with a variety of clean power alternatives. It is seeking permission to develop generation projects that could convert wave energy off the Pacific Coast into electricity. It is bullish on solar thermal technology, and it has a pilot project in the San Joaquin Valley in which cow manure is turned into electricity. "That's a dung good idea," cracks Darbee.

Jokes aside, Darbee is seriously excited about the prospect of plug-in hybrids that would draw power from the electricity grid at night and then feed power back into the grid during the day when demand peaks. These clean cars would burn less gasoline, pollute less and take advantage of the utility industry's capital-intensive infrastructure. "The energy industry," Darbee concludes, "is on the brink of a revolution." --Marc Gunther
 
#7
S.C. Johnson
Location: Racine, Wis.
Year founded: 1886
Revenue: $7 Billion
Employees: 12,000
Three generations of committed environmental stewardship.

In 1935, long before sustainability became a corporate buzzword, H.F. Johnson Jr. led a 15,000-mile expedition to Brazil in search of a sustainable source of wax, the carnauba palm tree, for his company's first product, Johnson's Wax.

His grandson and the current CEO, Fisk Johnson, has continued that legacy at S.C. Johnson, a family-owned company that makes Windex, Pledge, Ziploc bags and Raid. Its most notable innovation is its Greenlist process, a classification system that evaluates the impact of thousands of raw materials on human and environmental health. By using Greenlist, S.C. Johnson eliminated 1.8 million pounds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from Windex and four million pounds of polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC) from Saran Wrap, which is now PVDC-free. (VOCs and PVDC are both pollutants.) The company licenses Greenlist royalty-free to other firms that want to use it. It is also cutting back its reliance on coal-fired power, recently building its own power plant that runs on natural gas and methane piped in from a nearby landfill. Glenn Pricket of Conservation International says that when it comes to the environment, "Fisk Johnson is probably the most personally committed CEO I've met." --Marc Gunther
 
#8
Goldman Sachs
Location: New York
Year founded: 1869
Revenue: $69.4 Billion
Employees: 24,000
Bold climate-change policy shapes major investments.

When Goldman Sachs announced a groundbreaking environmental policy in 2005, critics said chief executive Hank Paulson was imposing his green ethos. Wrong. The bank has become even more planet-friendly since Paulson left. Why? Because it is doing lots of green business.

Goldman's investment of $1.5 billion in cellulosic ethanol, wind and solar have paid off. Texas Pacific and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts turned to Goldman, which had built bridges to environmental groups, as they prepared a bid for Texas energy company TXU. Research clients are pleased that Goldman's equity analysts in Europe now factor environmental, social and governance issues into their reports. "The world's changing," says one Goldman official. The company is too - some cars that take bankers home are hybrids. --Marc Gunther
 
#9
Swiss Re
Location: Switzerland
Year founded: 1863
Revenue: $24 Billion
Employees: 10,500
Developing financial tools to deal with the risks of climate change.

Swiss Re's main product is insurance for insurers, so its products never come near a smokestack. And Swiss reinsurance companies are not exactly known for boldness. Even so, Swiss Re has been way ahead of the pack on climate change, warning as early as 1994 about the bottom-line threat in the form of higher claims from storms and other weather-related disasters.

In addition, Swiss Re has pioneered products like weather-based derivatives to hedge these risks. Buyers can bet on future heat waves or cold snaps with puts and calls on specific periods of time and temperatures, much as conventional options have a preset strike price for a stock. So a farmer in India might be able to buy insurance from a local insurer in case the usual monsoon rains fail to arrive or, conversely, his fields are flooded. Swiss Re was also among the early supporters of the Chicago Climate Exchange, an emerging hub for traders in derivatives linked to carbon emissions. --Nelson D. Schwartz
 
#10
Hewlett-Packard
Location: Palo Alto
Year founded: 1939
Revenue: $91.7 Billion
Employees: 156,000
Silicon Valley's longtime industry leader in eco-sensitivity.

High tech is falling all over itself to go green. It may be that Prius-driving engineering types are more eco-sensitive than the rest of us, or maybe they're simply battling for competitive advantage. The fact is, as more of modern life goes digital, the environmental impact of those computers and gadgets has gone from negligible to considerable. Hewlett-Packard has done the most to mitigate that. HP owns massive e-waste recycling plants, where enormous shredders and granulators reduce four million pounds of computer detritus each month to bite-sized chunks - the first step in reclaiming not just steel and plastic but also toxic chemicals like mercury and even some precious metals. HP will take back any brand of equipment; its own machines are 100 percent recyclable. It has promised to cut energy consumption by 20 percent by 2010. HP also audits its top suppliers for eco-friendliness, and its omnibus Global Citizenship Report sets the standard for detailed environmental accountability. --Oliver Ryan

The greenest places to live

I realized that being green can be enabled by the area in which you live. If you live where recycling programs are bad, you will not be able to do as much as possible to recycle. There are many other factors that affect our lives and the degree to which we can help reduce our impacts...

I was curious what the greenest cities in America were. Here is what I found out! Displayed below are the top ten. The info came from Popular Science.
http://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2008-02/americas-50-greenest-cities?page=1

How the Rankings Work:

We used raw data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the National Geographic Society’s Green Guide, which collected survey data and government statistics for American cities of over 100,000 people in more than 30 categories, including air quality, electricity use and transportation habits. We then compiled these statistics into four broad categories, each scored out of either 5 or 10 possible points. The sum of these four scores determines a city’s place in the rankings. Our categories are:
  • Electricity (E; 10 points): Cities score points for drawing their energy from renewable sources such as wind, solar, biomass and hydroelectric power, as well as for offering incentives for residents to invest in their own power sources, like roof-mounted solar panels.
  • Transportation (T; 10 points): High scores go to cities whose commuters take public transportation or carpool. Air quality also plays a role.
  • Green living (G; 5 points): Cities earn points for the number of buildings certified by the U.S. Green Building Council, as well as for devoting area to green space, such as public parks and nature preserves.
  • Recycling and green perspective (R; 5 points): This measures how comprehensive a city’s recycling program is (if the city collects old electronics, for example) and how important its citizens consider environmental issues.

1. Portland, Ore. 23.1

  • Electricity: 7.1 Transportation: 6.4 Green Living: 4.8 Recycling/Perspective: 4.8
America’s top green city has it all: Half its power comes from renewable sources, a quarter of the workforce commutes by bike, carpool or public transportation, and it has 35 buildings certified by the U.S. Green Building Council.

2. San Francisco, Calif. 23.0

  • Electricity: 6.8 Transportation: 8.8 Green Living: 3.5 Recycling/Perspective: 3.9
  • See how San Francisco turns wasted roof space into power, here.

3. Boston, Mass. 22.7

  • Electricity: 5.7 Transportation: 8.7 Green Living: 3.4 Recycling/Perspective: 4.9
  • CASE STUDY: Grass Power
    Boston has preliminary plans for a plant that would turn 50,000 tons of fall color into power and fertilizer. The facility would first separate yard clippings into grass and leaves. Anaerobic bacteria feeding on the grass would make enough methane to power at least 1.5 megawatts’ worth of generators, while heat and agitation would hasten the breakdown of leaves and twigs into compost.

4. Oakland, Calif. 22.5

  • Electricity: 7.0 Transportation: 7.5 Green Living: 3.1 Recycling/Perspective: 4.9
  • See how Oakland's hydrogen-powered transit helps the city cut pollution, here.

5. Eugene, Ore. 22.4

  • Electricity: 10.0 Transportation: 4.7 Green Living: 2.9 Recycling/Perspective: 4.8
  • CATEGORY LEADER: Electricity
    Much of the wet Pacific Northwest draws its energy from hydroelectric dams. But Eugene draws an additional 9 percent of its municipal electricity from wind farms. It also buys back excess power from residents who install solar panel

6. Cambridge, Mass. 22.2

  • Electricity: 6.1 Transportation: 7.5 Green Living: 3.9 Recycling/Perspective: 4.7

7. Berkeley, Calif. 22.2

  • Electricity: 6.2 Transportation: 8.4 Green Living: 2.9 Recycling/Perspective: 4.7

8. Seattle, Wash. 22.1

  • Electricity: 6.2 Transportation: 7.3 Green Living: 4.7 Recycling/Perspective: 3.9

9. Chicago, Ill. 21.3

  • Electricity: 5.4 Transportation: 7.3 Green Living: 5.0 Recycling/Perspective: 3.6
  • CATEGORY LEADER: Green Space
    In addition to the 12,000 acres Chicago has devoted to public parks and waterfront space, the U.S. Green Building Council has awarded four city projects with a “Platinum” rating, its highest award.
    See how Chicago's power plants produce twice the energy with a third the carbon, here.

10. Austin, Tex. 21.0

  • Electricity: 6.9 Transportation: 5.9 Green Living: 3.3 Recycling/Perspective: 4.9

11. Minneapolis, Minn. 20.3

  • Electricity: 7.8 Transportation: 7.4 Green Living: 2.8 Recycling/Perspective: 2.3
  • CASE STUDY: Citizen Enviro-Grants
    If you’ve got a world-saving idea, the City of Lakes will give you, your church or your community group the money to get it done. Twenty $1,000 mini-grants and five $10,000 awards were distributed last year to programs ranging from household power-consumption monitors to “block club talks” about global warming. A similar initiative has sprung up in Seattle.

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Ecological footprint 2!


Were you able to achieve the ecological footprint reduction goals you set for yourself?
I was able to cut down my mobility score by carpooling more. This is important because I work in Seattle and have carpooled with a coworker whenever possible. I also carpool to the grocery store with friends once a week. It has become a fun ritual. When I am not in a rush, I take the bus whenever possible. It has been a bit of a challenge learning the routes and how to navigate and plan my trips but the more I do it the less of a hassle it has become.


I am also happy that I am buying less stuff. Looking at purchases from an environmental perspective has helped me to think about the consequences of my purchasing habits. It has also had a positive effect on my bank account! One of the biggest take-aways from this class is the ability to think about just how much I consume and all the waste that goes into making the products I buy. I really have gotten good at deciding the things I need versus the things I want.


I had hoped to do better on my food score so this is something I need to keep working on. I will say that I waste less food and do not throw as much stuff away because my friend and I share food with each other before it goes bad. This has also reduced the amount we both purchase. I have been using reusable grocery bags most of the time when I go to the store and while it is not accounted for in the footprint I feel that using less plastic bags does help, especially if everyone does it.

Analyze your behavior over the quarter – will you be able to continue these practices? Why or why not? 
Yes, I will be able to continue all of these at least while still living in Bellingham. When I graduate I will not be close enough to shop together with friends but hopefully I will be able to find new friends to shop with. Wherever I work I will try to find someone to carpool with. I also plan on taking public transportation more as I become more familiar with the bus routes. 


I will definitely keep buying less stuff. When I sat back and thought about all the stuff I own it was actually embarrassing to think about the money and natural resources that are wasted on unnecessary items. When I do buy things, I will think about how they are made and their impacts on the environment.


The one thing that will be the most difficult for me to continue doing is eating less meat. It is almost a habit to buy a steak or bacon that if I do not have the class to remind me I can see myself forgetting and then remembering after the fact. This will be something that I will work on and with time I hope to change my habits so that I do not think about buying meat nearly as often as I used to.

Monday, March 7, 2011

Sexy Green... Shake That Thing!

When I think of sexy, I think of myself in Windsor Castle, wearing a green fur thong, and massaging a lucky woman while talking dirty in an English accent. You on the other hand may have a different idea of sexy. However, there is no denying that Green is sexy, London is sexy; and Architecture is sexy. So why not combine all three and get something as sexy as Austin Powers pole-dancing to "Let's Stay Together."

What do I have in mind? A London Eco Green Tour!

Want a tour in the states? Try Bay Area Green Tours in San Fransisco.
http://matadornetwork.com/pulse/sustainability-is-sexy-learn-about-green-design-with-insider-london/
http://www.insider-worldwide.com/eco_green_london_tours/
http://www.bayareagreentours.org/

The Ad

An ugly man in a green fur thong lays next to a woman on a green bear rug by a fire.
He massages her and talks (in an english accent) about taking her on a tour of her wildest fantasies.
Narrator: Not your idea of sexy? What's wrong with this picture?
Green is sexy... English accents are sexy... Tours are sexy... Ohhh...
(fades to a good looking couple on a London Eco Green Tour)
[Show images of the the tour's architecture]
Narrator: Get your sexy on with a Eco Green London Tour

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Honda FCX

A friend of mine got me interested in this topic. We were cruising for chicks in his Toyota Prius and the only people waving at us were well groomed men. He then confided something to me...

"I love the environment and I love my Prius but I haven't had a date since I started driving this thing."
"What about that one girl you took out to dinner? She liked your car."
"I don't want to talk about it," my friend said.
"She wasn't a dude was she?"
"No, but she had hairy legs," he replied. "The only girls who dig my ride are hippies with armpit hair and dreadlocks."
"Wow, that is sad. I can't wait to blog about this!"
"That's messed up, you better not use my name!"

Tom then told me about the Honda FCX hydrogen car. At that point I knew I had a good blog topic to explore. He wished he lived in Cali so he could get an FCX and get a girl with less body hair than himself. He told me he was tired of being with women who reminded him of his mother. If you had ever seen Tom's mother you would know why this is important. The woman resembles a sasquatch. She makes Grizzly Adams look like a Barbie doll.

After laughing until tears ran down my face at Tom's recent romantic adventure I decided to do some research for my dear friend. From what I found out there will be about 200 of these being leased in the southern California area over the next 3 years. They lease for around $600/month.

The FCX is a hydrogen-powered fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) and releases no emissions. Because my IQ is lacking and my brain runs on about 1/2 horsepower I will be forced to quote the smart guys at TopGear to explain how it all works...

"A 171-litre hydrogen tank feeds the gas into the fuel cell stack, where hydrogen and atmospheric oxygen combine to produce electricity, with water as a by-product. That electricity drives a 134bhp motor, with any excess power stored in a lithium ion battery pack, which feeds supplementary electricity to the motor if needed. Regenerative braking also charges the battery."

Hopefully, drivers everywhere will be able to get their hands on one of these sweet rides. Until then Tom will just have to get used to having four hairy legs in his bed.

Here are some links of interest regarding the Honda FCX:
http://automobiles.honda.com/fcx-clarity/
http://www.topgear.com/uk/car-news/Honda-fcx-la
http://world.honda.com/news/2010/c100127New-Solar-Hydrogen-Station/
http://world.honda.com/news/2011/c110113Green-Purchasing-Guidelines/?r=rR

Friday, January 21, 2011

Green Is The New Black

For all you fashion conscious Greenies out there I have decided to make your life a little bit easier. Previously, when it came to clothes, I practiced sustainability by buying and wearing less clothes. Trying to do my part for the planet I would forgo as many items of clothing as possible. This meant that on most days I would end up wearing just my trench-coat. I felt proud of what I was doing and I am sure mother nature was equally pleased. Unfortunately, this obviously less-than-environmentally-friendly woman and her two little brat kids were not as pleased with my efforts. It turns out that when I reach into the inside pocket of my trench-coat, where I keep my wallet, the buttons have a tendency to come undone. After they screamed bloody murder, I was tackled by an off-duty sheriff's deputy and eventually hauled off to jail.

I explained to the judge how I was the hero for doing my part to protect our planet for future generations. He informed my that I had severely scarred two children belonging to those future generations and needed to pay for my crimes. My plea for clemency had fallen on deaf ears. Consequently, I was fined a few hundred dollars and had to spend the night in jail. To further the injustice, as a condition of my release I am now court-ordered to be "fully dressed upon leaving my residence." So there began my mission to find environmentally conscious clothing companies.

Some Green Companies For You To Support:

Simple Shoes - This company uses eco-certified leather and suede, recycled inner tubes, hemp, organic cotton, and many more green materials to keep you on your feet.

Patagonia - Follow all the destruction you cause when you buy one of their products using their "footprint chronicles" and then think of all the damage you would be doing if you were buying products from companies who didn't give a ____. Be sure to check out their Common Threads Recycling Program.

Nike - For Nike, sweatshops are a thing of the past. Now the only one sweating for Nike is you while training for that marathon or shooting hoops at the local gym. And with their Dri-FIT fabric, the fight against sweat goes on! Nike envisions a "closed loop" future where the clothes you discard today will be the clothes you buy tomorrow. Nike also spent over seven years and $6 million developing the Environmental Apparel Design Tool. Learn more at environmentalleader.com.

Nau - Re-defining quality as "the combination of beauty, performance, and sustainability."  If you get sticker-shock when looking at their prices just remember the cost of not buying sustainable products.

The North Face - I couldn't say it any better so I won't try; "Sustainability and conservation form the core of The North Face pledge to advance the well-being of the planet, its citizens and those who enjoy exploring it."
The North Face is also actively campaigning to reduce global warming by supporting 350.org and BICEP, two organizations fighting climate change.

Rapanui - At Rapanui, they make clothes using organic fabrics and renewable energy powered factories. among the awards they have earned for their efforts are the RSPCA 2010 Good Business Award and the 2009/10 Sustainable Business Award.

While it is best to buy less clothes, when you do decide to update your wardrobe keep these companies in mind. Remember, if you are not part of the solution then you are part of the problem. And because you have been a pain in society's side since you learned to walk it's time to quit being a problem child and make your momma proud! Do your part and support sustainability-focused companies.

Saturday, January 15, 2011

Paper Or Plastic?... Neither Dummy!

Last night while buying groceries I was asked a question I have heard a hundred times. Paper or plastic? This time I said paper because I use the paper bags to put all my recyclable paper products in. I usually get plastic because I like to reuse them in various ways. I primarily use them as trash bags or as toys when I am babysitting. My nephew likes to pretend he is an astronaut. They are also indispensable for the taxi ride home after an insane night of drinking. I have found that if you vomit in a cabbie's ride chances are you will end up walking the rest of the way home or wake up cuddled next to some homeless guy under an overpass.


Hearing this question, paper or plastic?, for the 474th time made me wonder which is better for the environment. I did a bit of research and found out that the answer is not so simple. I had to think about both product life cycles from cradle to grave.
Here is what I found:

Paper
Extraction Trees are logged (sometimes from sustainably managed forests, sometimes not).
Transportation - The trees are then shipped to a paper mill.
Manufacturing - After drying for approximately three years the trees are cut into little squares. Next, they are turned into pulp using limestone and sulfurous acid. The pulp is then washed with water and bleach. Finally, it is pressed into paper and made into paper bags.
Distribution - The paper bags are trucked to distribution centers from where they will eventually reach the supermarkets.
Use - Humans then use the bags to carry groceries to their lovely homes or double wides.
Disposal - The bags are then recycled or sent to a landfill.

Plastic
ExtractionOil is taken from the Earth.
Transportation - The oil is piped to refineries. Pellets are shipped to where the bags will be made.
Manufacturing - Once at a refinery, the oil is made into small polyethylene pellets. The pellets are then heated and formed into bags.
Distribution - The bags then are shipped by truck to distribution centers and eventually supermarkets.
Use - Again the bags are used for carrying groceries and other items from the stores to our homes. Bags are then repurposed as garbage sacks and playthings.
Disposal - Eventually they are either thrown into the trash bin or taken to a recycling center.

Wait!!!! The story does not end there. Many other things have to be taken into consideration. What does it take to recycle each product? What percentage actually gets recycled? How much energy does each process take? Etc., etc., etc. What's that you ask? Why yes I do have all the answers...
  • Paper bags take 4 times the energy to produce as plastic bags
  • Paper bag production generates 70% more air and 50% more water pollution that plastic bag production
  • Paper bags take 98% more energy to recycle than plastic bags
  • 10-15% of paper bags are recycled; 1-3% of plastic bags are recycled
  • Plastic compacts easier in landfills
Are You One Of The Dumb?
  • 7 in 10 Americans don't know that plastic is made from petroleum products, primarily oil
  • 4 in 10 believe plastic will biodegrade underground, in landfills, or in the ocean

Still confused? If so, I have a solution for you. Buy a few of those reusable grocery bags being sold in the stores. Make sure not to buy the branded bags with the supermarket's name on the side. I have a couple reusable Fred Meyer bags my momma gave me but I feel like a fool taking them into Haggen's. Another mistake I often make is keeping them inside the house. Keep them in your car that way you will not forget them at home and they will always be handy.

Now where is my nephew? I remember hearing him in the other room saying something about being on the moon but I haven't heard a peep out of the little Neil Armstrong in a half an hour.

Sources:

Thursday, January 13, 2011

My Experience Being Slowly Killed By An Axe

Axe Clix deodorant stick will kill your @ss lickity-split! Well maybe not exactly, in actuality this product only scored 5 out of 10 (moderately hazardous). This is good because it is not nearly as hazardous as the mercury (10) my mother let me play with as a child and which I just found out is linked to birth defects and reproductive organ cancers (my next check-up should be fun).

Ingredients - Dipropylene Glycol, Water, Propylene Glycol, Sodium Stearate, Poloxamine 1307, Fragrance, Aminomthyl Propanol, Disodium EDTA, BHT, Green 3 (CI 42053)

Ingredients in order of toxicity (10 being highly toxic and 0 being non-toxic) & concerns:

Fragrance (8) - Neuortoxicity, Allergies/immunotoxicity, Miscellaneous
BHT (6) - Neurotoxicity, Allergies/immunotoxicity, Organ system toxicity (non-reproductive),   Irritation (skin, eyes, or lungs), Occupational hazards, Biochemical or cellular level changes
Propylene Glycol (4) - Allergies/immunotoxicity, Organ system toxicity (non-reproductive), Irritation (skin, eyes, or lungs), Enhanced skin absorption
Disodium EDTA (3) - Neurotoxicity, Organ system toxicity (non-reproductive), Enhanced skin absorption
Aminomthyl Propanol (2) - Irritation (skin, eyes, or lungs), Contamination concerns (NITROSAMINES-in the presence of nitrosating agents,OXAZOLIDINE)
Dipropylene Glycol (1) - Irritation (skin, eyes, or lungs)
Sodium Stearate (1) - Occupational hazards
Green 3 [CI 42053] (1) - None Identified
Poloxamine 1307 (0) - None Identified
Water (0) - Innocuous


What scares me is that the most highly toxic ingredient is the most vague ingredient! Because it is impossible to research something that is kept secret I decided to look up the next most hazardous ingredient on the list, BHT.

BHT

This is also listed in many products as DBPC; Advastab 401; Agidol; Agidol 1; Alkofen BP; Antioxidant 29; Antioxidant 30; Antioxidant 4; Antioxidant 4K; Antioxidant KB; Antioxidant 8. Oops, I guess not all antioxidants are so good for you. I should probably stop thinking that everything labelled an antioxidant is beneficial.

The best concern on the list... this can change your body at the cellular or biochemical level. Perhaps this is the cause of my growing breasts. I didn't notice them until I started using deodorant a couple years ago.I really do not have bad body odor (I think I smell like strawberries) so for me the best plan of action is to only use it when I expect to be in situations where I may become nervous and sweat more. Another alternative I have is to use a natural product like Tom's of Maine's Fresh Apricot Deodorant; because who doesn't like apricots?

The product and ingredient information on this blog was found at http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/.














Monday, January 10, 2011

My Ecological Footprint

I was born approximately 4 weeks premature and weighed in at a whopping 2 1/2 pounds. Despite this fact I have grown to be a GIANT... well that is what a detective would conclude if he found my ecological footprint at the scene of a crime. After recently taking an Ecological Footprint quiz it is clear that I need not only be careful when committing crimes; I have to focus on leaving as little of a trace as possible, crime scene or not.

If everyone lived as environmentally friendly as good ol' me:
  • It would take 5 planet Earths to provide enough resources
  • We would use 22 global acres of productive area
  • Collectively produce 24 tons on carbon dioxide

My Ecological Footprint Breakdown went like this:
  • Services 40%
  • Mobility 21%
  • Goods 16%
  • Food 13%
  • Shelter 9%
My mother tells me I am almost certain to end up homeless and eating out of dumpsters. If this happens I will no longer need to worry about the last two items on the list. However, until that time comes It will benefit both the Earth and myself if I focus on consuming less meat. This will also make some cows in California even happier; perhaps they will give me a spot in their next commercial!

Besides consuming less meat, here are some other things I will start doing to reduce my footprint:
  1. Carpool to work with my good buddy Joel as often as our schedules allow (this will also save me the embarrassment of having to push-start my car at every 4th or 5th stop light).
  2. Bring my own container for leftovers when going out to eat.
  3. Buy products from companies and local businesses that are environmentally responsible (using the knowledge gained in this class to expand the number of companies and local businesses I support).
  4. Replace the meat I remove from my diet with locally grown and/or organically grown fruits and veggies.
Recently I have been driving to my internship in Seattle at Bonsai Media Group that my friend, who is working there, hooked me up with. We are both in the MBA program at WWU and live in Bellingham. This gives us a great opportunity to save gas money, wear and tear on our autos, and reduce our Ecological Footprints.

I often go out to eat and I always feel guilty the next day when I am throwing the Styrofoam containers that housed my leftovers into the trash can. There are unused containers sitting in my cupboard that I will bring with me to restaurants.

I already try to buy local and organic foods when I have the option but I know I can do more as far as making sure I go to stores that have the most choices so that I am able to guy more local and organic foods. There is also room for improvement on the consistency in which I purchase locally grown produce. By going shopping when I am not in a hurry I should allow myself more time to search for the most Earth friendly items. In addition to this I also need to become better informed about where things come from and how they are produced so I am not misled by clever marketing (my goodness those marketers are evil!).

Other Thoughts

I will admit that I produce a lot of garbage and buy too much junk (stuff I really need). I like collecting and much of the stuff I collect is not new; a good portion of it is vintage and antique items. That being said, quite a few of the things I collect are new and much of it requires that trees be cut down, plastic be produced, and metals be taken from the ground. I know I am not going to stop collecting things that appeal to me but I can be more aware of how the things I collect affect our planet.

This thought popped into my minuscule brain the other day when I heard my friend complain that he had gone through 3 can openers in the last 6 months... To save money we often buy low price, low quality items such as a $10 can opener. I have a $30 can opener that belongs to my set of top quality Rosle kitchen utensils (that I collect). Mine may have cost 3 times the price but now that he is on his 4th one he has spent $10 more than I have and 4 can openers have been shipped from China instead of just 1. Just for the sake of laziness we will say that 3 times the energy has been used for production, 3 times the pollution has been produced, and 3 times the natural resources have been used as well. Now when he teases me about being a snob because I have a nice can opener I can state that at least I am caring for our planet.